BATMAN RETURNS (1992)

BATMAN RETURNS (1992)

The cover to the Batman Returns Bluray

These young Marvel whippersnappers in the 21st Millennium really have no understanding of what a phenomena the first Tim Burton Batman film. Everyone, and I mean everyone, had Batman merch. Pop culture today wouldn’t be where it is because this Batman film legitimised the superhero as something other than a thing that kids consumed.

Sure the marketing that supports films like Avengers and Spiderman are like that now, and the #release the Snyder cut was a social media sensation, but when this film came out there wasn’t social media, so all the Batman hype was word of mouth supported by the single striking image of Batman’s emblem.

Michael Keaton as the Bat

Of course, it’s crazy popularity spawned a sequel and just like Die Hard, Batman Returns is an even split action film and Christmas movie.

As I side note, the early 90s were such a dry time for horror and the promise of a Batman character on the cover of a magazine meant that even Fangoria, the cornerstone of all things horror at the time, put the Penguin on the cover in an attempt to garnish an increase in sales.

What was Batman’s latest adventure, well, hold onto your cowls!

Gotham City is thrown into chaos during the Christmas season when a deformed outcast known as the Penguin (Danny DeVito) emerges from the sewers, seeking revenge against the society that rejected him. Aligning himself with corrupt tycoon Max Shreck (Christopher Walken), the Penguin launches a campaign to become mayor while secretly plotting to destroy the city’s children. Meanwhile, Shreck’s timid secretary Selina Kyle Michelle Pfeiffer) is transformed into the vengeful Catwoman after a near‑death experience, setting her on a collision course with both Shreck and Batman (Michael Keaton), who has already been dealing with problems caused by the Curcus of Crime.

As Batman struggles to protect Gotham, he faces the dual threat of Penguin’s monstrous schemes and Catwoman’s unpredictable vendetta. The battle culminates in a showdown beneath the city, where alliances unravel, identities are exposed, and Gotham’s fate hangs in the balance.

Michelle Pfeiffer as The Cat

As with the previous film, the look of this is something of a visual feast. Every look created in the first film by Anton Furst and Tim Burton was built upon to create an even more obtuse and impossibly gothic city.

The costume design reflects this as well. It’s this amazing mix of bondage gear and 19th century attire all via a mid 80s London gothic nightclub. The amazing thing is how all the costumes really reflect the inner workings of the characters, from the Penguin’s need to be accepted with his attempt an finery, to Catwoman’s fractured state and her badly stitched outfit that slowly falls apart as she descends more and more into madness.

Danny DeVito as The Bird

Keaton still somehow kicks butt as Batman too. I must admit to being a hater of the idea of Mr Mom being the Bat in the first film but I was very quickly swayed by his performance, and it continues here.

I do have one massive problem with this film and it’s something that many superhero films do now, and that is they suffer from T.M.V.S.: Too Many Villain Syndrome and it makes the story a bit of a trial to keep tabs on all that’s going on. With a big team movie like The Avengers, that’s ok, but when it’s essentially one guy… and I reckon Batman works best as one guy… against so many villains with their multiple plots, it becomes muddy and the prime villain seems less of a threat.

Like many sequels, this film is nowhere as good as the first, but it’s still entertaining and a feast for the eyes.

The very stacked menu screen

Extras: Extras? You want Extras, you say? Well sit down and get ready for this cavalcade of stuff, and I’d just like to point out that this comes from a time when extras weren’t a couple of five minutes ‘behind the scenes’ stuff and a gag reel that clearly has nothing funny happen in it, and it’s generally the best acting any of the actors do with the film. I’ll also point out that on this disc a lot of the extras were shot on videotape so they look like shit.

There’s a Commentary by Tim Burton which are great to listen to as his love of the creative process is evident.

The Bat, The Cat and The Penguin is a behind the scenes look at the making of the film with interviews dozens with cast and crew.

Shadows of the Bat Part 4: Dark Side of the Night is the 4th part of a Batman documentary series that went across the Bluray releases for Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever and Batman and Robin. Really fascinating and altogether a real complete look at these four films. I will admit the best parts are the Joel Schumacher parts on the next two discs as the describe what a clusterfuck this franchise became when they realised what a marketing minefield it was.

Batman: The Heroes including Batman and Alfred, and The Villains, including The Penguin, Catwoman and Max Schreck are short dissections of the characters of the film by various writers and creators.

Gotham City Revisited is a fascinating look at the production design of the film.

Sleek, Sexy and Sinister is a fantastic look at the amazing costumes of the film.

Making up The Penguin looks at DeVito’s make up as this deplorable horror show that in the Penguin.

Assembling the Arctic Army discusses the wrangling and complicated methods needed to assemble the Penguin army.

Bats, Mattes and Dark Nights disassembles the special effects of the film.

Inside the Elfman Studiotalks to Danny Elfman about the music of the film, and I’m a big Oingo Boingo fan so I’m always happy to see interviews with him.

There is also the film clip for Face to Face by Siouxsie and the Banshees and, of course, and Theatrical Trailer… phew!

Film: 7/10

Extras: 8/10

Rewatchability: 8/10

Christopher Walken as Max Shrek

This Bluray was purchased from JB Hifi

8MM (1999)

The Australian Cinema Cult release of 8MM

8MM (1999)

You know how sometimes you watch a film and think what an absolute classic it is and wonder why it doesn’t get more respect? This is how I feel about this film, 8MM from 1999.

8MM is written by Andrew Kevin Walker, who also wrote Se7en and in my opinion, sits neatly next to that film in its story and quality of thrills. Maybe it doesn’t get the credit it deserves because it has Nicolas Cage instead of Brad Pitt as its lead, and Joachim Phoenix instead of Morgan Freeman, and in 1999 is was before Phoenix got his academy award, lending him ‘legitimacy’, and before Cage became everyone’s favourite meme for the Wicker Man… ‘the bees… THE BEEEEESSSSSSSS’.

This is the weird thing about this film is whilst it should be a A thriller, it feels like a B movie, which is something I believe Joel Schumacher (The Lost Boys), the director, was vying for: the sleazy subject matter perhaps deserved to be sleazy in its presentation. Probably a smart artistic decision but maybe it’s one of the reason why it’s not necessary regarded as highly as Se7en or Silence of the Lambs.

Nic Cage as Tom Welles

8MM tells of private investigator Tom Welles (Nicolas Cage) who is hired by Mrs Christian (Myra Carter), a millionaire’s widow, to inventive an 8MM film found amongst his belongings in a safe I his office. The contents of this film are that of a young girl being brutalised and murdered, and Mrs Christian wants to be assured that the film isn’t real.

Joaquin Phoenix as Max Californian

This leads Welles to getting assistance from porno shop worker Max California (Joaquin Phoenix) who takes him to the dark side of underground porno films, where he meets the likes of adult film star procurer Eddie Poole (James Gandolfini), porno Star Machine (Chris Bauer) and pornographer Dino Velvet (Peter Stormare), but will he find out the truth, or will he be drawn into a web of sleaze from which he may never return?

Jenny Powell as Mary Ann Mathew’s

Thrillers for me are just as important as horror, and I love a bit of crime/ gumshoe styled stuff as well… all these things are in a Venn diagram that has Giallo in the centre so I guess that makes sense. This film is a high point of crime and thriller and a massive dollop of noir within it as well.

Schumacher really shows just how accomplished a filmmaker he is with this film as it shows the personalities of the various cities and their population. He shows the underside of the porn world and the filming gets dirtier and dirtier as it goes on. Spectacular to watch. What I also really love is the fact that when we get to the end of the film and the ‘monster’ is revealed, its presented as a final scene in a Universal monster pic.

Walker’s script is solid too, and I reckon just as fine a pic as the aforementioned Se7en. In actual fact, I tend to hit a trilogy of films when I watch this, 8MM, Se7en and Silence of the Lambs. Three amazing thrillers that I reckon are all as good as each other but have various levels of respect from film fans and critics, 8MM being the embarrassing little brother who gets drunk before everyone else.

I really do think this film is high quality, even though it’s described as being to sleazy and predictable, of which the latter I don’t find to be true. Cage is really good in this as are the rest of the cast, even though the pornographers may be charactatures of those types of people were like in the 90s: I have no point of reference

I think it is definitely worth a revisit if you have not seen it in a while. Considering the advances in technology, the story still holds up nicely.

The menu screen for the film

Extras:

Just a little 5 minute making-of that was not really worth my 5 minutes.

Film:9/10

Extras: 2/10

Rewatchability: 10/10

Peter Stormare as Dino Velvet

This Bluray was purchased from JB HiFi

FALLING DOWN (1993)

FALLING DOWN (1993)

The cover to the Australian release of Falling Down

Movies are a wonderful thing insomuch that as you change through your life, they hit differently.

I first saw this film in 1993 at the cinemas that were just a short walk from my house. I was in love with two things then; the woman who is still my wife all these years later, and the movies. I’d grown out of comics and toys and video games and I hadn’t yet discovered the joys of writing like I do now.

The second time I saw this film was on the 29th July 2009. I know that date because I bought it on the day it came out. At that point had three loves: I’d been married over ten years to the same woman, a daughter we shared and still, good old cinema.

Finally I watched it today. Married 30 odd years, adult daughter, and me still writing and loving movies, though now I only work casual after being a retail manager for 30 odd years as I had a stroke during lockdown (unrelated to the vaccine) and can’t really work full time due to a bit of PTSD and a mild learning disorder.

I know, I know: why am I telling all this boring personal crap?well it is relevant to movies hitting differently. When I first saw it, I watching it as a fan of film, a fan of director Joel Schumacher and a fan of Michael Douglas. I didn’t get excited by the politics of the film because basically I am not sure I fully understood them at that age.

The second time I watched it more as a student of film, and looked at the nuances of how it was made and honestly paid little attention to the story but more on performances and mise en scene and all that cool movie stuff that we feel is so important.

Now, I see what it really is: it’s a story about how easily we get chewed up and spat out by society. It’s about how we rarely see how we are seen by others. About how no matter how important you feel you are in a situation, you are not. It’s about how people talk about main character energy, but no one actually has it. In a hundred years, nothing you have done matters, but it’s how you deal with that realisation is the key to your happiness.

Michael Douglas as D-Fens

Falling Down was written by Ebbe Roe Smith, who also gave us Turner and Hooch, and was directed by Lost Boys director Joel Schumacher, and tells the story of a man we come to know as D-Fens (Michael Douglas) who after sitting in a traffic jam on a hot day, decides to abandon his car and make his way to his estranged ex-wife, Beth’s (Barbara Hershey) house to visit his daughter, Adele (Joey Singer) on her birthday, and the trail of violence he leaves in his wake as he sees so many people in the city seeming trying to stop him.

Barbara Hershey as Beth

Falling Down is also about Detective Prendergast (Robert Duvall), a cop who has been convinced by his wife (Tuesday Weld) to retire, even though he clearly doesn’t share her desire, but is willing to comply for her mental health. On his last day though, he is the only one who joins the dots on D-Fens’ rampage, and convinces his former partner, Sandra (Rachel Ticotin) to help him solves the puzzle of who the man is that’s committing all these acts of violence across the city.

Robert Duvall as Prendergast

I feel this film is about the pressure of a modern lifestyle and the pressures put on us from others around us, and how we make conscious choices as to how we deal with them. I think as a younger man I did sympathise with D-Fens but as I have matured, and I use that term very loosely, I see so much more in this film. I think it’s also about futility as well, as no matter how hard you work, it’s not appreciated in the way you would like to think it does.

The film has so much racism and prejudice stamped all over it and that is certainly a sign of the times it was made, and I hope as a society we have become a little more tolerant. The film cleverly initially identifies D-Fens from a misunderstood man, to vigilante to nutjob quite subtlety that you don’t even immediately become aware that the guy who you were at first thinking ‘yeah, I’m with you brother’ has become psychotic, and as we explore his background, may have always been that way. They even make you doubt your feigning support as you meet an intolerant crackpot who aligns himself with D-Fens, much to his disgust, and he rejects what he has become entirely.

I love all the choices of the actors in this film. I have a theory that every movie’s story is a ‘B’ movie’s story but it’s the choice of actors that elevate it. This is certainly the case here. All the budget would have gone to the quality of actors and the performances, but everyone, from Douglas’ slow descent into psychopathy to Weld’s hysterical wife, nail their performance. Sure they all feel a little cartoonish at times but I think Schumacher’s direction sometimes borders on that.

Another thing I do really like about this film, and it’s something that was brought to my attention in a book about Psychos and Madmen in film (it may have been by John McCarthy, I can’t quite remember) is that most films like this already have the psycho in full flight, revelling in their psychopathy. In this film, we see the last straw leave the antagonists mind, and through the course of the film you find that while you have sympathy FOR him, you don’t sympathise WITH him, something that I didn’t necessarily understand at all previously. Seeing the slow devolution is am impressive feat in the story, direction and performance.

Weirdly, I used to like this film a whole lot more, but it resonates so different with me at my current stage of life, so it’s dropped of maybe a whole point. Is that because it rings true or because I’m in a different place politically? I guess that’s something for me to work out.

… it’s certainly evidence of what a wonderful thing cinema is, as I always thought.

The menu screen to the Australian bluay

Extras: Not many extras on this disc, but the directors commentary by Schumacher, Smith, Douglas, editor Paul Hirsch and others is fascinating, as is the interview with Douglas about the character of D-Fens and the different obstacles the film had to overcome to get to the cinema.

There is also a trailer.

Film: 6/10

Extras: 6/10

Rewatchability: 4/10

A madman with a gym bag of guns is not healthy.

This Bluray was purchased from JB Hifi

AUDITION aka ǑDISHON (1998)

The steelbook cover to Arrow Video’s Audition

AUDITION aka ǑDISHON (1998)

I first saw Audtion many years ago on a terrible DVD released in Australia that was too dark and muddy and even in such an awful format, it effected me. This Bluray release has none of that and it is an even better watch, as you would expect.

Director Takahashi Miike (Ichi the Killer) has created such a mind blowing psycho-sexual piece of cinema that to stick it in a box marked ‘psychological thriller’ or ‘horror’ is to take away its impact. When first released in Japan in 1999 as Odishon, it was played in such a poor array of dead-end theatres that it whimpered out and looked like it was going to disappear without a trace. Luckily, in 2000, Audition was then picked up for film festivals in both Vancouver and then Rotterdam, where it won both the FIPRESCI prize and the KNF award, and in the following year at Fantsporto in Portugal, it won the International Fantasy Film Award – Special Mention award and was nominated for International Fantasy Film Award.

Based on a story by Ryu Murakami, Audition is the tale of a man, Shigeharu Aoyama (Ryo Ishibashi), who, after the death of his wife, finds it hard to meet a new woman. Inspired by comments made by his son, Shigehiko (Tetsu Sawaki), as to how loneliness is making him prematurely age, he embarks on a mission to meet women. Using his position as a video producer he starts a series of auditions for a fictional project.

Shigeharu Aoyama (Ryo Ishibashi)

After looking over many women, he finally meets Asami (Eihi Shiina), whose exquisite delicateness intrigues Aoyama, and her quiet demeanour intrigues him, even though she is close in age to his son.

Asami and Aoyama slowly develop a friendship which blossoms into something more intimate, but after they make love for the first, Asami disappears and Aoyama starts an investigation to find her, but what he finds is that she may not have been telling him the entire truth…

The seemingly delicate Asami (Eihi Shiina)

All through this movie there is such a feeling of claustrophobia and discomfort that unlike many films gets right under your skin, as do most of Miike other films. The juxtaposition of moments of quiet beauty and subtle relationship building, combined with some of the shock moments (that I won’t reveal here) are truly amazing. The real trick here is that there are moments of intimacy that are filmed more like claustrophobia than closeness, and that adds to the unsettled nature of this new relationship between the main leads.

… maybe NOT so delicate…

Although Miike doesn’t make horror films per say, he is however a reluctant genre film director who has had horror cult status thrust upon him, which is why films like this, and his others like Visitors Q and his comic adaptation Ichi the Killer are such fascinating watches.

This story works so effectively as it doesn’t adhere to stereotypes, as one would expect from a film that didn’t get punched out of the Hollywood thriller cookie cutter. This film reminds me of the first time I read American Psycho by Brett Easton Ellis, the combination of subtle day-to-day suddenly flipped on its head. This is a movie that will stick with you for a long time after you watch it.

The menu screen to the Arrow Video Blu-ray

Disc: An absolute treasure trove of extras on this disc. I must also point out that the film can be watched with an introduction by Miike.

First, we have two commentaries, The first by director Takashi Miike and screenwriter Diasuke Tengan, and a second by Tom Mes. The first is in Japanese so it is subtitled and is enthusiastic and interesting. The second is performed by Mes, a writer who has written books about Miike’s career. It is interesting but less so that the aforementioned one. It is in English.

There is a series of interview with cast and crew: Takashi Miike, Ryo Ishibashi, Eisis Shiina, Renji Ishibashi and Ren Osugi. These interviews are each quite long and not like the ones you would get from American films with a few sound bytes of actors and directors massaging each other’s egos. These are fascinating insights into the film and each individuals history.

Damaged Romance; An Appreciation by Tony Ry looks both at Miike’s career and specifically the making of this film, and even the history of Japanese genre films.

There are two trailers for the film, one Japanese and the other the international one.

Another useless image gallery.

You’ll lose your head over this film.

RING (1998)

The cover to Arrow’s Ring Bluray, taken from The Ring Collection

RING (1998)

This is where you start with J-horror, right? This was the one that got us all involved in the late 90s. Ring is the parent that introduced us too all the Japanese horror we ended up craving: The Grudge, Dark Water, Pulse… not to mention directors like Takashi Miike, Hideo Nakata and their contemporaries.

Personally, I think a lot of the increased mainstream love of anime came from that time, as horror fans became more involved in the culture of various Asian countries, it leeched into the regular nerds and normal people via some good and some not so good remakes, and that trickled all the way through pop culture. I pretty much went think the popularity of Junji Ito relates directly to it.

That’s just my observation of the time.

(NB: I’m well aware that there were anime and manga fans before this time, heck I was one of them as I grew up loving Japanese cartoons, which is what they were called before the word ‘anime’ came to western culture properly, but my observations say the world seems to be more into it since 2000. Post COVID and lockdown even more so!

Asakawa (Nanako Matsishima)

Anyway, enough about my musings. Ring is based on the novel by Kôji Suzuki, with a screenplay by Hiroshi Takahashi. The film was directed by Hideo Nakata, who didn’t not want to be a horror film director, but basically became the spark that turned the west predominantly into j-horror fans.

Ring tells of journalist Reiko Asakawa (Nanako Matsushima), who has started a quite aggressive investigation into the urban myth of a VHS video tape that kills you 7 days after you first watch it, and warns you with a phone call where just the words ‘7days’ are whispered to you. This investigation is so urgent as it has just killed her niece, Tomoko (Yûko Takeuchi).

Asakawa eventually finds the tape, watches it and reveals that the myth may be true, and now she has 7 days to find a ‘cure’ to this spiritual virus that lies within the cassette. She shows he ex-husband the tape and the two of them research the footage on the tape in an attempt to find a cure… this attempt becomes more frantic when her young son also watches the tape.

Asakawa’s son, Yôichi (Rikiya Ôtaka)

There research finds a connection to a psychic woman who died many years earlier, and the mystery of her daughter, Sadako (Rei Ino’o)…

There is no doubt that Hideo Nakata has created an almost perfect horror film with this movie. It is weirdly over-dramatic with its acting at times, and borders into pantomime but it somehow all sits correctly. When it came out it was such an extraordinarily different thing, seeing as how the 80s was all about the creation of franchises, a mistake cinema is repeating now with the desperation to find the next Marvel or Star Wars series, and the 90s was predominantly a pop culture wasteland, especially with horror seeing as how self-referential stories became the norm after the popularity of the Scream franchise.

The tape!!

Basically I love this film. After being so disappointed how how awful horror had become in the 90s, this was like a breath of fresh air.

The story itself being a strange take on ‘hauntings’ and ‘curses’ was great, and probably due to the fact that Japan doesn’t have its creepies and crawlies based in Christianity like we still do in the west, judging by the popularity of the Conjuring universe. This added with, at the time, my lack of exposure to Japanese culture in general other than Robotech and Akira, just the different lifestyle, cities et cetera made it a visual feast. I actually name this film as being the thing that made me interested in watching Japanese architecture YouTube channels, especially the ‘tiny apartments’ ones.

I cant recommend this film enough. If you haven’t seen this Japanese ‘Ring’ but have seen the Gore Verbinski remake starring Naomi Watts, still give this a go as it is still a fantastic watch with a few differences in the story.

The menu screen to Arrow Video’s Ring

Disc: This Arrow video disc was available singularly, but also as a part of the Ring Trilogy box set which featured Ring, Ring 2 and Ring 0.

This disc has a bunch of cool extras on it though.

There is an Audio Commentary by David Kalat, author of J-Horror, The Definitive Guide to The Ring, The Grudge and Beyond. His is an enthusiastic commentary which reveals him to be very ‘in’ with the whole J-horror sub genre of horror, even though he has a disclaimer that he doesn’t speak Japanese so some of his pronunciations may be inaccurate.

The Ring Legacy looks at the entire scope of the Ring series, from the source material, to films, to video games and to the western remakes. A real fascinating inside into the entire scope of the series.

A Vicious Circle sees author and critic Kat Ellinger explore director Hideo Nakata’s career and the Rings influence on western horror.

Circumnavigating Ring is a video essay by Alexandra Heller-Nicolas, who here explores the evolution of the series.

Sadako’s Video is an opportunity for us, the film fan, to see the SADAKO video in its complete form… don’t forget to copy it and give it to someone else.

Three ring trailers including 2 for the Ring and Spiral double bill (which have far too groovy a soundtrack considering the subject matter), and a UK Trailer.

There’s also a useless image gallery.

The image everyone knows: Sadako revealed!!

This review was done with a copy of the Bluray of Ring taken from Arrow Video’s Ring Collection. Their was purchase from Arrow’s website

The Haunting (1999)

Film: The 90s were a time where horror was really suffering. The idea of creating a franchise rather than good, quality horror, due to the popularity of Jason, Michael and Freddy, had become paramount to the studios and it didn’t kill the genre, but it certainly put it on life support.

The Blair Witch Project was a clever manipulation of the general populace with a crappy film made interesting by the suggestion that is was real, and many people fell for it. It want u til Scream thoigh that Wes Craven really pulled horror back from being like westerns or musicals: only made now and again for nostalgias sake.

Another thing that saved horror in the late 90s and early 2000s was the remake, the idea that taking an older film and redoing it. Not a new idea surely, especially when you consider the popularity of John Carpenter’s The Thing and Chuck Russell’s The Blob. Also, taking a film from another country and making an English version of it seemed to really give the genre a kick in the pants. Yep, remakes were the way to go…

Unfortunately, and I’m burying the lead here, The Haunting possibly wasn’t a great choice.

The Haunting is a close to the book film, based on the novel The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson, and this version was written by Road to Perdition’s David Self and directed by Speed’s Jan De Bont.

It’s tells of Nell (Lili Taylor) who after 11 years of taking care of her ill mother, has joined a group including Theo (Catherine Zeta Jones) and Luke (Owen Wilson) of people with sleep disorders, collected together by Dr. David Marrow (Liam Neeson), at Hill House, a beautiful old mansion with a hidden secret.

The house isn’t the only thing Wilma secret though, Dr. Marrow hasn’t brought them to the house for an insomnia study… no, he had brought them together to study fear, and house suggestions can make the human mind create a false narrative, but what he didn’t expect was that the house MIGHT just actually be haunted…

This film starts of with a casting choice that’s pretty impressive. Taylor, Neeson and Zeta Jones are really quite adept at the character archetypes they create (the shut-in, the nutty doctor and the slut) but unfortunately Wilson sticks out like a sore thumb. Sure he’s fun in the comedies he’s been in, but here he feels like he’s taking nothing seriously. I’m not sure if De Bont thought he could take the bone-headed surfer dude-type and make him a serious actor route again, like he did with Keanu Reeves in Speed, but it doesn’t work here. He seems to take none of it seriously, and that’s a detriment to the story, which is a shame because with the right cast this could have been ok… even a challenger to the other remake about a haunted house that came out at a similar time, The House on Haunted Hill.

It is, however, nice to see cameos from Marian Seldes and Bruce Dern.

Unfortunately the visual aspirations of the film were possibly a little high too. There are several cgi effects that are so bad… SO BAD… that it’s hard to take the film seriously. I’m not a fan of bagging a film too much due to its effects, I’ve seen some films with truly DIRE special effects, but these are really horrible. A product of the time, sure, but terrible.

On the flipside if that, the set design is grand, and majestic, and overdone as some if those old mansions were!

It’s final and main problem is it’s just not good! The story is fine, but the jump scares aren’t jump scares, and the slow burn scares just don’t work. It’s never truly a scary film as a movie about scary ghosts SHOULD be!

Another issue I have with this film is the packaging. Lili Taylor is clearly the star of this film, but she is 4th billed on the cover, and in the original marketing. She’s a fine actor and that’s a bloody crime!

On a good note though is the quality of this Bluray. The image is super bright and crisp and presented in a 2.35:1 image, and the audio, which will really work out your bass channel, is presented in Dolby DTS-HD MA 5.1.

Even though the accuracy to the novel is lacking, the Netflix series The Haunting of Hill House is a more entertaining prospect, you’d honestly be better off watching that.

Score: **1/2

Extras: Absolutely nothing.

Score: 0

WISIA: It’s not really very interesting, so no.

R.I.P Ernie Colón: Comic artist

Was very sad this morning to find out that comic legend Ernie Colón had passed away.

Colón was born in Puerto Rico in July 1931, but lived in the US until his passing on the 8th August 2019.

Colón started as a letter for Harvey Comics working on Richie Rich before working as an artist for the same Company.

Throughout his career, he worked for Dc Comics, Marvel Comics, Warren Publishing, Eclipse, Atlas Comics and Valiant, on characters like Amethyst, Dreadstar, Damage Control, Red Sonja, Magnus Robot Fighter and many others.

Tragically, Colón passed away, aged 88 after a year of fighting cancer, but his legacy of over 60 years working in the comics field, not to mention painting, sculpting and other works, has left an indelible mark on the industry.

Rest In Peace, Mr. Colón.

All images (c) copyright their respective owners

Dustin Ferguson’s New Documentary

If, like me, you love a good… or even a bad… doco about cinema, you might be interested in this film currently about to hit production, by Dustin Ferguson, director of Robowoman and Horndogs Beach Party.

This documentary, titled ‘Direct To Video – Straight to Video Horror of the Nineties’ is certainly something I’ll be VERY interested in as personally, I think the i0s is the very WORST decade for horror, and of that opinion can be changed, I’ll be open to it.

Poster by Mancat Design.

Deep Blue Sea (1999)

One from the rewatch pile…

Deep Blue Sea (1999)

Film: You have just got to love a good monster movie, and it’s especially great when that film has a monster that is either based in reality, or is reality tweaked to some tiny degree to make it even more fearsome, or in the case of a film like, say Zombeavers or Night of the Lepus, a tiny bit fearsome.

So, of course everyone loves a good shark movie; hell, if the Sharknado films are anything to go by, everyone loves even a BAD shark movie! Deep Blue Sea came along at just the right time: The 90s, in general, was a wasteland of bad horror being made as studios tried to tap into what made the 80s franchises so great, but missed either the point, or the boat.

Sure this decade gave us Scream, which in itself was a parody of Craven’s own work, and The Blair Witch Project, which was more about clever marketing than good filmmaking or storytelling but in general, horror had temporarily gone the way of the western.

Deep Blue Sea was somewhat of a surprise. Written by Valentine’s Donna and Wayne Power, and Bait’s Duncan Kennedy, one thing from the 80s this film did utilise was Renny Harlin as director, who is probably best know for A Nightmare on Elm Street 4, and a whole bunch of action films from the 90s, including Cliffhanger and Die Hard 2.

Deep Blue Sea tells of a scientific facility in the ocean known as Aquatica, where scientists, including Dr. McAlester (Saffron Burrows), Jim Whitlock (Stellan Skarsgård) and other are attempting to show off to a potential investor, Russell Franklin (Samuel L. Jackson) their research into getting proteins from genetically altered shark’s brains and using them to repair the broken pathways in the brains of sufferers of Alzheimer’s disease.

The problem is the sharks have gotten smarter, and even though shark wrangler Carter Blake (Thomas Jane) has suspicions, even he isn’t aware of just how smart, and very soon the sharks have figured out how to flood the facility, and using the staff as their very own human smorgasbord…

This film honestly could have been called ‘Deep Blue Trope’ as it took generic formulas from 80s slasher films and turned them into a monster movie. This is basically Friday the 13th, with the stereotypical teens (the cool black guy, the oversexed couple, the frigid final girl and the cool tough guy… and some throwaway characters you would never care about) in an abandoned area with no way out and something stalking them, which is a shark instead of a serial killer: it even does the killer POV camera shots! Maybe the juxtaposition of these two horror tropes is what makes the film kind of interesting.

The movie, yes, is generic, but I have to admit that I have a big problem with just how smart the sharks became. An animal working out that a gun is something that can hurt you is one thing, but figuring what video cameras do and then disabling them, with no context, is quite another, and ultimately, Jane’s character’s realisation as to the shark’s motivation, we’ll, even for a monster movie is pretty far-fetched.

There is some nice early appearances of some actors who went on to the greater things. Samual L. Jackson was still an actor when this was made, and didn’t just play Samual L. Jackson, like he does these days.

The real tragedy of this film is the closing credits are choked with an awful rap by LL Cool J, who also plays the chef who works at the facility. I also must admit to feeling sorry for Saffron Burrows: Even though her character is possibly the most important one in the film, and is even the only human on the cover, she actually doesn’t get a cover credit, and instead Skarsgård and Michael Rapaport, who aren’t in it as often, do. That’s a pretty sad indictment on the film’s release.

Score: ***

Format: This film was reviewed with the Australian, region B Bluray release of the film which runs for approximately 105 minutes and is presented in a satisfactory 2.35:1 image with a pretty spectacular DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1audio.

Score: ***1/2

Extras: There’s a couple of Ok extras on this disc.

First there is a commentary with Harlin and Jackson, but I’m pretty sure they weren’t recorded together. Jackson talks about the story of the film, and Harlin looks more at the making of the film and the processes.

When Sharks Attack is a selection of behind the scenes footage with an occasional sound byte from a cast or crew member, which, to summarise, comes together as ‘sharks are scary’.

Sharks of the Deep Blue Sea looks at all the various effects used to make the special effects sharks work.

There is a trailer for the film.

There’s a bunch of deleted scenes as well, and, as expected, the optionally accompanying commentary does little to convince otherwise.

Score: ***

WISIA: Deep Blue Sea is an amusing distraction that I have watched a couple of times, but realistically, if it weren’t for a sequel coming out, I probably would not have revisited it.

The Super Nintendo Mini for Horror Fans!

So today I grabbed one of these beauties:


The Super Nintendo Mini! I preordered it several weeks ago, actually upon announcement, as this was my favourite video game system of all time.


I’ve only hooked it up to a little Sonic TV and I’ve played almost all of the 21 games, I leave the RPGs to a later date, but the unit is cute, about ten cm square and 5 or 6 cm high, but the controllers feel like they are the same size as the old ones. I bought it so I could play Super Mario and Mario Kart again, but was thrilled to find that a couple of frustrating old favs in the horror/ science fiction genre have made it on as well.


The awesome sideways scrolling…. actually, these three all are…. beat em up/ shoot em up Castlevania IV where you are making your way through a map slowly taking on harder and harder villains and obstacles.


Next is Super Ghouls and Ghosts:


Super Ghouls n Ghosts was a classic arcade game and it’s still fun and frustrating and features a brave knight in a fight against zombies, werewolves and other supernatural beasties.


Last but not least was the game Contra III: The Alien Wars


Contra III is another similar style of game but can be for two players simultaneously as two tough guys are up against an alien invasion.

So what did I think of the unit? Well, I’m not a retro gamer in the slightest and even though I appreciate the look back at the past and the fun that I had with these games, especially things like Starfox and Street Fighter in addition to the ones I mentioned above, but I’d rather super cool, realistic graphics and online connectivity with my gaming. Sure this was fun, but we certainly live in a better time for gaming now!

It’s a fun distraction, but I don’t see myself playing it for a great deal of time.